Journalist, publisher and IPA Prix Voltaire recipient Pham Doan Trang was charged with "disseminating anti-state propaganda." Several international humanitarian organizations are lending their voices to condemn conviction and call for her immediate release.  


The 43-year-old Vietnamese free-expression activist, publisher, and author Pham Doan Trang won the IPA’s Prix Voltaire in 2020 for the clandestine Liberal Publishing House’s work.

Charge: ‘Disseminating Anti-State Propaganda’

International humanitarian organizations today (December 14) are sharply condemning the news that Vietnamese publisher and author Pham Doan Trang, 43, has been sentenced in Hanoi to nine years in prison. She’s reportedly charged with “disseminating anti-state propaganda.”

The recipient of the 2020 Prix Voltaire from the  International Publishers Association (IPA) for Vietnam’s clandestine Liberal Publishing House, Trang had last been in the news in late October when a trial date was understood to have been set for her in early November. At that point, an international cohort of 28 advocacy associations made a joint appeal for her release. As it would happen, the trial seems to have been held a month later than anticipated.

As Publishing Perspectives readers will recall, Trang’s arrest shortly before Frankfurter Buchmesse last year occurred shortly before she was scheduled to appear during a program at Frankfurter Buchmesse 2020. She was seized, according to reports, in Ho Chi Minh City on charges of carrying out anti-state activities.

José Borghino, IPA’s secretary-general, today has issued a statement from the association’s offices in Geneva, saying, “All publicly available information about this case, the charges and the process make it impossible to see this as anything but a show trial.

“The International Publishers Association commends Pham Doan Trang for her bravery in the face of this persecution which can only be intended to intimidate others into silence.”

As Chris Humphrey is reporting today for the Washington Post, “In sentencing Trang, the Hanoi People’s Court gave her more time in prison than the seven to eight years prosecutors had requested. Trang, who was repeatedly interrupted by the judge during the trial, rejected all the charges. Her lawyers said she was informed of her trial date only a day before.”

Amnesty International’s Ming Yu Hah, the deputy regional director for campaigns, has also spoken out, saying, “It is outrageous that the Vietnamese authorities are convicting Pham Doan Trang, a courageous journalist and human rights defender, who has for years fought for a just, inclusive, and rights-respecting Viet Nam.

“Her work should be celebrated and protected, not punished and criminalized.”

Trang: ‘In a Less Fortunate Situation’

Pham Doan Trang has an extensive relationship of protest and harsh response from the authorities. It is said that she has a limp because of an injury suffered during an environmental protest broken up by police six years ago.

Trang was given Reporters Without Borders’ 2019 Prize for Impact. It’s write-up of her work said, in part, “The author of many books including one defending the rights of Vietnam’s LGBT communities, she has been beaten by the police because of her work and was detained arbitrarily twice for several days in 2018.”

According to an Agence France-Presse report carried today by the Bangkok Post, during her hearing, Trang testified to being detained 25 times since 2015, and said she had been terrorized by security forces. She’s remembered by many in Vietnam, that report notes, for her 2016 writings on Vietnam’s toxic spill that killed tons of fish and “prompted rare protests across the country.”

The report says that journalists and diplomats were allowed to view her one-day trial via a video feed, the signal of which frequently cut out.

In TheVietnamese, a journalists’ magazine Trang founded, her “final statement” from her trial has appeared today. It reads, in part:

“In a democratic society, if a citizen writes something or responds to interview questions from foreign journalists regarding matters the government doesn’t want to hear, what would be the civilized response? The most civilized response would be for the government to do nothing because a civilized person knows how to respect the opinions and interests of others.

“In a less fortunate situation, if a government has authoritarian tendencies and finds what the citizen says unacceptable, then it could simply write books or articles to rebut that citizen, or even boldly reach out to the foreign press to arrange an interview in which a government representative expresses his/her viewpoint or responds to the citizen in-kind.

“But the Socialist Republic of Vietnam does none of this. Instead, it chooses to respond in a more vile, foolish, and heinous manner, imprisoning its citizens simply because they write works or respond to interviews with foreign journalists.”